Essay on The Importance of Psychodynamic Forces

According to Bion, a function of the conflict between the mentality of the group and the desires of the individual is referred to as the culture of the group. The behavior of group members is regulated by the culture of the group and evidence of the basic assumptions operative within the group is provided by it. One of the tendencies of the group was also reported by Bion, i.e., by the establishment pairing relationships the tendency to break up the fight-flight culture. Identity is the second construct.

The characteristics that distinguish the culture, climate, task, and members from other groups, is referred to as identity. How individual leadership is considered by the members, how the leader is experienced by the teams and the style and personality of the leader are influenced by the identity of the group.

An extension of the typology of leadership types of Freud is the five leadership styles, i.e., histrionic, compulsive, depressive, schizoid, and paranoid. With the original typology of Freud these five leadership styles are aligned, i.e., the narcissistic type aligned with the dispassionate and disinterested schizoid style, the obsessional type is aligned with paranoid and compulsive styles, the erotic type is aligned with depressive and histrionic styles.

One of the basic assumption mentalities of fight-flight (BAF) is that the culture and the organization are linked with the paranoid style. Within baF groups, the leaders are preoccupied with procedures and rules and suspicion and aggression is experienced by them. A significant influence on the group is exercised by the leader due to the centrality of power related to the paranoid style. The culture of dependency is linked with the histrionic style, i.e., where the catalyst for the group’s morale is the leader.

Tagged with:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *